Publications

2023

• Akhtar, A.; Ye, H. (2023). Reproducibility and Robustness Replicability of Gsottbauer et al. (2022), I4R Discussion Paper Series, No. 29, Institute for Replication (I4R). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/270890 
• Bach, R. L., Cornesse, C., & Daikeler, J. (2023). Equipping the Offline Population with Internet Access in an Online Panel: Does It Make a Difference? Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smad003. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smad003
• Behrens, L., Nyhuis, D., & Gschwend, T. (2023). Constructive and Destructive Legislative Review: The Government-Opposition Divide in Parliamentary Oversight. The Journal of Politics, 85(1), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1086/720649 
• Blesse, S. (2023). Do your tax problems make tax evasion seem more justifiable? Evidence from a survey experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 102365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102365
• Blesse, S., Buhlmann, F., & Doerrenberg, P. (2023). I am a Taxpayer ... Get Me Out of Here?!? Evidence on Attitudes Towards Simplifying the Tax Jungle.
• Bjånesøy, L., Ivarsflaten, E., & Berntzen, L. E. (2023). Public political tolerance of the far right in contemporary Western Europe. West European Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2167046
• Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2023). Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels. Sociological Methods & Research, 52(2), 879–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914940 
• Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Sohnius, M., Gonzalez Ocanto, M., Rettig, T., & Ungefucht, M. (2023). Experimental Evidence on Panel Conditioning Effects when Increasing the Surveying Frequency in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Survey Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2023.v17i3.7990
• Engelmann, D., Janeba, E., Mechtenberg, L., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2023). Preferences over taxation of high-income individuals: Evidence from a survey experiment. European Economic Review, 157, 104505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104505 
• Friedel, S., Felderer, B., Krieger, U., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2023). The Early Bird Catches the Worm! Setting a Deadline for Online Panel Recrutiment Incentives. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 370–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221096970 
• Gummer, T., Höhne, J. K., Rettig, T., Roßmann, J., & Kummerow, M. (2023). Is there a growing use of mobile devices in web surveys? Evidence from 128 web surveys in Germany. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01601-8
• Gummer, T., Kunz, T., Rettig, T., & Höhne, J. K. (2023). How To Detect and Influence Looking Up Answers to Political Knowledge Questions in Web Surveys? Public Opinion Quarterly, nfad027. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad027
• Höhne, J. K. (2023). Are respondents ready for audio and voice communication channels in online surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(3), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1987121 
• Rammstedt, B., Roemer, L., & Lechner, C. (2023). Consistency of the structural properties of the BFI-10 across 16 samples from eight large-scale surveys in Germany. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000765
• Rettig, T. & Struminskaya, B. (2023). Memory Effects in Online Panel Surveys: Investigating Respondents’ Ability to Recall Responses from a Previous Panel Wave. Survey Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2023.v17i3.7991
• Rohr, B., Silber, H., & Felderer, B. (2023). Comparing the Accuracy of Univariate, Bivariate, and Multivariate Estimates across Probability and Non-Probability Surveys with Populations Benchmarks [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n6ehf

2022

• Adendorf, A. (2022). Topic Order in Election Manifestos. How the Order of Policy Issues Affects Voters’ Perceptions of Parties’ Key Issues.
• Axenfeld, J. B., Blom, A. G., Bruch, C., & Wolf, C. (2022). Split Questionnaire Designs for Online Surveys: The Impact of Module Construction on Imputation Quality. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smab055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab055
• Axenfeld, J. B., Bruch, C., & Wolf, C. (2022). General-purpose imputation of planned missing data in social surveys: Different strategies and their effect on correlations. Statistics Surveys, 16, 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1214/22-SS137
• Behrens, L., Nyhuis, D., & Gschwend, T. (2022). Constructive and Destructive Legislative Review: The Government-Opposition Divide in Parliamentary Oversight. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/720649
• Blesse, S., & Nover, J. (2022). Morgen, morgen, nur nicht heute! Wie die Deutschen ihren Blick auf öffentliche Haushaltsdisziplin ändern. ZEW-Kurzexpertise.
• Cornesse, C., Felderer, B., Fikel, M., Krieger, U., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Recruiting a Probability-Based Online Panel via Postal Mail: Experimental Evidence. Social Science Computer Review, 40(5), 1259–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211006059
• Cornesse, C., Gonzalez Ocanto, M., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Rettig, T., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Measurement instruments for fast and frequent data collection during the early phase of COVID-19 in Germany: reflections on the Mannheim Corona Study. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-022-00030-5
• Cornesse, C., Krieger, U., Sohnius, M.-L., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., & Blom, A. G. (2022). From German Internet Panel to Mannheim Corona Study: Adaptable probability-based online panel infrastructures during the pandemic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 185(3), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12749
• Duch, R. M., & Falcó-Gimeno, A. (2022). Collective Decision-Making and the Economic Vote. Comparative Political Studies, 55(5), 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211036045
• Ebbinghaus, B., Lehner, L., & Naumann, E. (2022). Welfare state support during the COVID-19 pandemic: Change and continuity in public attitudes towards social policies in Germany. European Policy Analysis, 8, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1152
• Einarsson, H., Sakshaug, J. W., Cernat, A., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Measurement equivalence in probability and nonprobability online panels. International Journal of Market Research, 64(4), 484–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221085206
• Engst, B. G., Gschwend, T., Hönnige, C., & Brouard, S. (2022). Who should be selected to the highest courts? Evidence from Survey Experiments in France, Germany and the United States.
• Epperson, R. (2022). Do Beliefs about Lobbying Affect Pro-environmental Behavior? Experimental Evidence. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4050519
• Fehr, D., Müller, D., & Preuss, M. (2022). (In-)equality of Opportunity, Fairness, and Distributional Preferences. CESifo Working Paper No. 10001. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4257200
• Felderer, B., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Acceptance of the Automated Online Collection of Geographical Information. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(2),866–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882480
• Felderer, B., & Herzing, J. M. E. (2022). What about the Less IT Literate? A Comparison of Different Postal Recruitment Strategies to an Online Panel of the General Population. Field Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X22113294
• Friedel, S., Felderer, B., Krieger, U., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2022). The Early Bird Catches the Worm! Setting a Deadline for Online Panel Recruitment Incentives. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221096970
• Grüner, H. P., & Rohde, L. M. (2022). The Value of Choice – Evidence from an Incentivized Survey Experiment. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper DP17425. 
• Gsottbauer, E., Müller, D., Müller, S., Trautmann, S. T., & Zudenkova, G. (2022). Social class and (un)ethical behaviour: Causal and correlational evidence. The Economic Journal, ueac022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac022
• Höhne, J. K., Krebs, D., & Kühnel, S.-M. (2022). Measuring Income (In)equality: Comparing Survey Questions With Unipolar and Bipolar Scales in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 40(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320902461
• Innocenti, F. (2022). Essays in information design [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Innocenti, F., & Rohde, L. M. (2022). Selective Exposure Reduces Voluntary Contributions: Experimental Evidence from the German Internet Panel.CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series No. 340.
• Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., & Reifenscheid, M. (2022). Preferences for Centralized Decision-Making in Times of Crisis: the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. In J. Sauermann, M. Tepe, & M. Debus (Eds.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie (pp. 1–27). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35878-5_1
• Kern, C., Gerdon, F., Bach, R. L., Keusch, F., & Kreuter, F. (2022). Humans versus machines: Who is perceived to decide fairer? Experimental evidence on attitudes toward automated decision-making. Patterns, 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100591
• Keusch, F., Wenz, A., & Conrad, F. (2022). Do you have your smartphone with you? Behavioral barriers for measuring everyday activities with smartphone sensors. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107054
• Kilb, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Mata, J. (2022). A theory-based video intervention to enhance communication and engagement in online health communities: two experiments. Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 10(1), 199–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2032074
• Lehrer, R., Stöckle, P., & Juhl, S. (2022). Assessing the relative influence of party unity on vote choice: Evidence from a conjoint experiment. Political Science Research and Methods. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2022.45
• Lenzner, T., & Höhne, J. K. (2022). Measuring subjective social stratification: How does the graphical layout of rating scales affect response distributions, response effort, and criterion validity in web surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1874607
• Rettig, T., Blom, A. G., & Höhne, J. K. (2022). Memory Effects: A Comparison Across Question Types. Survey Research Methods, 17(1), 37–50. doi.org/10.18148/srm/2023.v17i1.7903
• Rettig, T. (2022). Respondent and Response Behavior in Online Panel Surveys [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Revilla, M., Höhne, J. K., & Rettig, T. (2022). Differences in measurement quality depending on recall: results for a question about trust in the parliament. Quality & Quantity.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01441-6
• Rohde, L. M. (2022). Essays on individual and collective decision making [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].

2021

• Alon, T., Coskun, S., Doepke, M., Koll, D., & Tertilt, M. (2021). From Mancession to Shecession: Women's Employment in Regular and Pandemic Recessions. NBER Working Paper No. 28632.
• Baerg, N., Duell, D., & Lowe, W. (2021). Inflation expectations, attitudes towards the ECB, and central bank announcements.
• Blesse, S. (2021). Are Your Tax Problems an Opportunity Not to Pay Taxes? Evidence From a Randomized Survey Experiment. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper  No. 21–040.
• Blesse, S., Buhlmann, F., & Doerrenberg, P. (2021). Attitudes Towards Tax Simplification: Evidence from a Representative Survey and Experiments.
• Blom, A. G., & Möhring, K. (2021). Soziale Ungleichheit in der Beschäftigungssituation während der frühen Phase der Coronakrise. Datenreport 2021, 476–483.
• Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Cornesse, C., Rettig, T., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., & Krieger, U. (2021). Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of the COVID-19 Contact-Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e23362. https://doi.org/10.2196/23362
• Cornesse, C., & Schaurer, I. (2021). Inklusion von Menschen ohne Internet in zufallsbasierte Onlinepanel-Umfragen. In T. Wolbring, H. Leitgöb, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter (pp. 71–98). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34396-5_3
• Cornesse, C., & Schaurer, I. (2021). The Long-Term Impact of Different Offline Population Inclusion Strategies in Probability-Based Online Panels: Evidence From the German Internet Panel and the GESIS Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320984131
• Debus, M. (2021). Kosmopolitisches und parochiales Freizeit- und Urlaubsverhalten und ihr Einfluss auf Kandidatensympathie und Wahlabsicht im Kontext der Bundestagswahl 2017. In B. Weßels, & H. Schoen (Eds.), Wahlen und Wähler (pp. 273–295). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33582-3_14
• Dolls, M., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2021). Attitudes towards euro area reforms: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 67, 101971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101971
• Epperson, R. (2021). Essays in Behavioral and Experimental Economics [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Felderer, B., Herzing, J. M. E., Bruch, C., Krieger, U., & Blom, A. G. (2021). How does switching a Probability-Based Online Panel to a Smartphone-Optimized Design Affect Response Rates and Smartphone Use? Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2021-00007
• Silber, H., Tvinnereim, E., Stark, T. H., Blom, A. G., Krosnick, J. A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S. L.,  Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A.-S., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., & Tu, S.-H. (2021). Lack of Replication or Generalization? Cultural Values Explain a Question Wording Effect. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smab007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab007
• Höhne, J. K. (2021). Are respondents ready for audio and voice communication channels in online surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1987121
• Juhl, S., & Hilpert, D. (2021). Wheeling and dealing behind closed doors: Estimating the causal effect of transparency on policy evaluations using a survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.67
• Lehrer, R., Bahnsen, O., Müller, K., Neunhöffer, M., Gschwend, T., & Juhl, S. (2021). Crisis Leadership Approval: The Opposing Effects of Perceived Threat and Anxiety.
• Mata, J., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Möhring, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., & Naumann, E. (2021). Health behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population-based survey in Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 287, 114333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114333
• Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., & Naumann, E. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being: longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family. European Societies, 23(1), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1833066
• Möhring, K., Reifenscheid, M., & Weiland, A. (2021). Is the Recession a ‘Shecession’? Gender Inequality in the Employment Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tzma5
• Möhring, K., Weiland, A., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Wenz, A., Rettig, T.,  Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Inequality in employment trajectories and their socio-economic consequences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/m95df
• Müller, D., & Renes, S. (2021). Fairness views and political preferences: Evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample. Social Choice and Welfare, 56, 679–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01289-5
• Rettig, T., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Memory Effects as a Source of Bias in Repeated Survey Measurement. In A. Cernat, & J. W. Sakshaug (Eds.), Measurement Error in Longitudinal Data (pp. 3–18). Oxford University Press.
• Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2021). Repeatedly Measuring Political Interest: Can we Reduce Respondent’ Recall Ability and Memory Effects in Surveys Using Memory Interference Tasks? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(3), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa035
• Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Combining Scientific and Non-scientific Surveys to Improve Estimation and Reduce Costs. In T. Rudas, & G. Péli (Eds.), Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science (pp. 71–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54936-7_4
• Sternberg, S., Brouard, S., & Hönnige, C. (2021). The legitimacy-conferring capacity of constitutional courts: Evidence from a comparative survey experiment. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12480
• Wehrhöfer, N. (2021). Essays in Public Economics and Political Economy [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Wenz, A. (2021). Completing Web Surveys on Mobile Devices. Does Screen Size Affect Data Quality? In T. Wolbring, H. Leitgöb, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter (pp. 101–121). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34396-5_4
• Wenz, A., & Keusch, F. (2021). The Second-Level Smartphone Divide: A Typology of Smartphone Usage Based on Frequency of Use, Skills, and Types of Activities. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.05142

2020

• Ackermann-Piek, D., Korbmacher, J. M., & Krieger, U. (2020). Explaining Interviewer Effects on Survey Unit Nonresponse: A Cross-Survey Analysis. In K. Olson, J. D. Smyth, J. Dykema, A. L. Holbrook, F. Kreuter, & B. T. West (Eds.), Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective (pp. 193–206). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003020219
• Blesse, S., & Heinemann, F. (2020). Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 438–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.018
• Blom, A. G. (2020). Zum gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit der Corona-Pandemie. Ergebnisse der Mannheimer Corona-Studie. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte,  70(35–37), 16–22.
• Blom, A. G., Cornesse, C., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., & Reifenscheid, M. (2020). High Frequency and High Quality Survey Data Collection: The Mannheim Corona Study. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7735
• Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Das Leben in Deutschland im Ausnahmezustand – Bericht zur Lage vom 20. März bis 09. Juli 2020. German Internet Panel.
• Bujard, M., Laß, I., Diabaté, S., Sulak, H., & Schneider, N. F. (2020). Eltern während der Corona-Krise. Zur Improvisation gezwungen. BiB.Bevölkerungs.Studien 1/2020.https://doi.org/10.12765/bro-2020-01
• Cornesse, C. (2020). The Utility of Auxiliary Data for Survey Response Modeling: Evidence from the German Internet Panel. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00008
• Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914940
• Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J. A., De Leeuw, E. D., Legleye, S., Pasek, J., Pennay, D., Phillips, B., Sakshaug, J. W., Struminskaya, B., & Wenz, A. (2020). A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz041
• Engelmann, D., Janeba, E., Mechtenberg, L., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2020). Preferences Over Taxation of High-Income Individuals: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. CESifo Working Paper No. 8595. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707935
• Engst, B. G., Gschwend, T., & Sternberg, S. (2020). Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Ein Spiegelbild gesellschaftlicher Präferenzen? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00204-7
• Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Naumann, E., & Möhring, K. (2020). Determinants of Public Support for COVID-19 Containment Policies in Germany: Evidence from Individual-Level Panel Analyses.
• Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Demokratische Kontrolle in der Corona-Krise. German Internet Panel.
• Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz politischer Maßnahmen und befürchtete Konsequenzen für die Wirtschaft. German Internet Panel.
• Kerschbamer, R., & Müller, D. (2020). Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample. Journal of Public Economics, 182, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104076
• Koos, S., & Lauth, F. (2020). Die gesellschaftliche Unterstützung von Fridays for Future. Konturen der weltweiten Protestbewegung. In S. Haunss, & M. Sommer (Eds.), Fridays for Future – Die Jugend gegen den Klimawandel (pp. 205–226). Transcript.
• Lehrer, R., & Lin, N. (2020). Everything to everyone? Not when you are internally divided. Party Politics, 26(6), 783–794.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812222
• Lehrer, R., Juhl, S., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Mörhing, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Die vier Phasen des Social Distancing in Deutschland. German Internet Panel.
• Möhring, K., & Teney, C. (2020). Largest public opposition to a gender boardroom quota in EU countries with the highest formal gender equality. LSE European Politics and Policy Blog.
• Möhring, K., Heinemann, F., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zum subjektiven Arbeitslosigkeitsrisiko der Beschäftigten in Deutschland. German Internet Panel.
• Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zur Erwerbstätigkeit in Deutschland 20.3.-14.4.2020. German Internet Panel.
• Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zur Erwerbstätigkeit und Kinderbetreuung. German Internet Panel.
• Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Inequality in employment during the Corona lockdown: Evidence from Germany. JESP European Social Policy Blog.
• Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Weiland, A., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zur Nutzung und Akzeptanz von Homeoffice in Deutschland während des Corona-Lockdowns. German Internet Panel.
• Naumann, E., Mata, J., Reifenscheid, M., Möhring, K., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zum Angstempfinden in der Bevölkerung. German Internet Panel.
• Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). COVID-19 policies in Germany and their social, political, and psychological consequences. European Policy Analysis, 6(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1091
• Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). Comparing the participation of Millennials and older age cohorts in the CROss-National Online Survey panel and the German Internet Panel. Survey Research Methods, 14(5), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i5.7619
• Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). How long do respondents think online surveys should be? New evidence from two online panels in Germany. International Journal of Market Research, 62(5), 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320943049
• Wiśniowski, A., Sakshaug, J. W., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Integrating Probability and Nonprobability Samples for Survey Inference. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 120–147.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz051
• Yordanova, N., Angelova, M., Lehrer, R., Osnabrügge, M., & Renes, S. (2020). Swaying citizen support for EU membership: Evidence from a survey experiment of German voters. European Union Politics, 21(39), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520923735
• Yordanova, N., Angelova, M., Lehrer, R., Osnabrügge, M., & Renes, S. (2020). Why EU member states should take heed of the sovereignty concerns of their citizens. LSE European Politics and Policy Blog.

2019

• Blesse, S., Buhlmann, F., & Dörrenberg, P. (2019). Do People Really Want a Simple Tax System? Evidence on Preferences Towards Income Tax Simplification. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper  No.19–058.
• Buss, C. (2019). Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: A vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718757684
• Hahm, H., König, T., Osnabrügge, M., & Frech, E. (2019). Who settles disputes? Treaty design and trade attitudes toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). International Organization, 73(4), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000249
• Herzing, J. M. E., & Blom, A. G. (2019). The Influence of a Person’s Digital Affinity on Unit Nonresponse and Attrition in an Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 37(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318774758
• Herzing, J. M. E., Blom, A. G., & Meuleman, B. (2019, February 26–28). Modelling Group-Specific Interviewer Effects on Nonresponse Using Separate Coding for Random Slopes in Multilevel Models  [Conference Presentation]. Interviewers and Their Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective Workshop, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska, United States.
• Herzing, J. M. E., Vandenplas, C., & Axenfeld, J. B. (2019). A data-driven approach to monitoring data collection in an online panel. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 10(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1332/175795919X15694136006114
• Höhne, J. K., Yan, T. (2019). Investigating the impact of violations of the “left and top means first” heuristic on response behavior and data quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1696087
• Koos, S., & Naumann, E. (2019). Vom Klimastreik zur Klimapolitik. Die gesellschaftliche Unterstützung der „Fridays for Future “-Bewegung und ihrer Ziele: Forschungsbericht. Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System.
• Möhring, K., Teney, C., & Buss, C. (2019). Who supports gender quotas for company leadership? An empirical analysis of determinants of support and rejection among German citizens. Soziale Welt, 70(2), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2019-2-121
• Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Ruiz, D., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Supplementing Small Probability Samples with Nonprobability Samples: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Official Statistics, 35(3), 653–681. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0027
• Solodoch, O. (2019). Regaining Control? The Political Impact of Policy Responses to Refugee Crises. International Organization. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753

2018

• Cornesse, C. (2018). Representativeness and response quality of survey data  [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Doerrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2018). Tax Morale and the Role of Social Norms and Reciprocity. Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment.  CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7149. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3237993
• Etzel, T. (2018). Essays in Local Public Finance and Political Economy  [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Gschwend, T., Juhl, S., & Lehrer, R. (2018). Die „Sonntagsfrage“, soziale Erwünschtheit und die AfD: Wie alternative Messmethoden der Politikwissenschaft weiterhelfen können. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 59, 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0106-8
• Herzing, J. M. E. (2018). The impact of technological change on survey nonresponse and measurement [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Jedinger, A., & Schoen, A. (2018). Anti-Americanism and Public Attitudes toward Transatlantic Trade, German Politics, 27(3), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2017.1332181
• Krieger, U. (2018). A penny for your thoughts – the use of cash incentives in face-to-face surveys [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Lehrer, R., Juhl, S., & Gschwend, T. (2018). The wisdom of crowds design for sensitive survey questions. Electoral Studies, 57, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.012
• Leonard, M. M., & Ropers, G. (2018). Social Desirability in Political Attitudes: A Comparison of Online Probability Panels and Microwork Platforms.
• Marx, P., & Naumann, E. (2018). Do right-wing parties foster welfare chauvinistic attitudes? A longitudinal study of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. Electoral Studies, 52, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.011
• Naumann, E. (2018). Tax Constraints, Social Policy Preferences, and Support for Redistribution. Societies, 8(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030046
• Naumann, E., & Stoetzer, L. F. (2018). Immigration and support for redistribution: survey experiments in three European countries. West European Politics, 41(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1344040
• Silber, H., Stark, T. H., Blom, A. G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Implementing a multinational study of questionnaire design. In T. P. Johnson (Ed.), Advances in comparative survey methods: multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts(3MC) (pp. 161–180). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch8
• Stark, T. H., Silber, H., Krosnick, J. A., Blom, A. G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S. L., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., & Yu, R.-r. (2018). Generalization of classic question order effects across cultures. Sociological Methods & Research,  49(3), 567-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304

2017

• Berger, M., Blesse, S., Heinemann, F., & Eckhard, J. (2017). Föderalismuspräferenzen in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 18(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2017-0007
• Blom, A. G., & Herzing, J. M. E. (2017). Face-to-face Rekrutierung für ein probabilistisches Onlinepanel. In S. Eifler, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung (pp. 99–118). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15834-7_4
• Blom, A. G., Herzing, J. M. E., Cornesse, C., Sakshaug, J. W., Krieger, U., & Bossert, D. (2017). Does the Recruitment of Offline Households Increase the Sample Representativeness of Probability-Based Online Panels? Evidence From the German Internet Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316651584
• Buß, C. (2017). Public Opinion towards Labour Market Reforms in Europe. A Multidimensional and Dynamic Perspective on Attitudes [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
• Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Ackermann-Piek, D., Helmschrott, S., Bruch, C., & Sakshaug, J. W. (2017, March 15–17). The Representativeness of Online Panels: Coverage, Sampling, and Weighting [Conference Presentation]. General Online Research, Berlin, Germany.
• Ebbinghaus, B., & Naumann, E. (2017). Welfare state reforms seen from below: comparing public attitudes and organized interests in Britain and Germany. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63652-8
• Hahm, H., Osnabrügge, M., Frech, E., & König, T. (2017). Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes: A Conjoint Analysis of Public Support for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
• McMichael, J. L. (2017). Preferring Refugees. How German Attitudes Changed During the European Refugee Crisis and Along Historical State Divides  [Doctoral dissertation, Duke University].
• Naumann, E. (2017). Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology. Ageing and Society, 37(2), 266-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001129

2016

• Angelova, M., König, T., & Proksch, S. (2016). Responsibility attribution in coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Electoral Studies, 43, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.004
• Blesse, S., Heinemann, F., & Janeba, E. (2016). Einhaltung der Schuldenbremse und Bewertung von Länderfusionen: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in allen 16 Landesparlamenten. ZEW policy brief No. 6/2016.
• Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315574825

2015

• Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population: The German Internet Panel. Field Methods, 27(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494
• Frech, E., König, T., & Osnabrügge, M. (2015). Öffentliche Unterstützung von Reformen und ihre Stabilität in Zeiten der Eurokrise – eine experimentelle Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit von Gegenargumenten. ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 25(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2015-2-219
• Greene, Z. D., & Haber, M. (2015). The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 37, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.002
• Haber, M. (2015). The legislative consequences of internal conflict and inter-party divisions. Research & Politics, 2(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015589216
• Pforr, K., Blohm, M., Blom, A. G., Erdel, B., Felderer, B., Fräßdorf, M., Hajek, K., Helmschrott, S., Kleinert, C., Koch, A., Krieger, U., Kroh, M., Martin, S., Saßenroth, D., Schmiedeberg, C., Trüdinger, E.-M., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Are incentive effects on response rates and nonresponse bias in large-scale face-to-face surveys generalizable to Germany? Evidence from ten experiments. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 740-768. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv014

2014

• Bernecker, A. (2014). Is Status Quo Bias Explained by Anchoring? Evidence from Survey Experiments.
• Blom, A. G., & Durrant, G. B. (2014, May 15-18). Correlates of attrition in the German internet panel: drop-outs and sleepers  [Conference Presentation]. AAPOR2014: American Association for Public Opinion Research, Anaheim, United States.
• Lenzner, T., & Soiné, H. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) – Modul “Inflation” der November 2014 Welle: Kognitiver Online-Pretest. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.17173/pretest40
• Lenzner, T., Neuert, C., & Otto, W. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) Reforms Monitor 2014: Kognitiver Pretest. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.https://doi.org/10.17173/pretest20
• Wendt, C., Naumann, E., & Klitzke, J. (2014). Reformbedarf im deutschen Gesundheitssystem aus Sicht der Bevölkerung. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 60(4), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2014-0404

2013

• Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys: a conceptual framework. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00001
• Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2013). The German Internet panel: Method and results.