Publications

2020

Ackermann-Piek, D., Korbmacher, J. M., & Krieger, U. (2020). Explaining Interviewer Effects on Survey Unit Nonresponse: A Cross-Survey Analysis. In Olson, K, Smyth, J. D., Dykema, J., Holbrook, A. L., Kreuter, F., West, B. T., Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective (pp. 193-206). New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, doi.org/10.1201/9781003020219
Blom, A. G., Cornesse, C., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., & Reifenscheid, M. (2020). High Frequency and High Quality Survey Data Collection. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7735
Cornesse, C. (2020). The Utility of Auxiliary Data for Survey Response Modeling: Evidence from the German Internet Panel. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (SMIF), Special issue: ‘Fieldword Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveys’. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00008
Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels. Sociological Methods & Research (online first). doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914940
Cornesse, C., Blom, A., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J., De Leeuw, E., & Legleye, S. et al. (2020). A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research. Journal Of Survey Statistics And Methodology, 8(1), 4-36. doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz041
Höhne, J. K., Krebs, D., & Kühnel, S.-M. (2020). Measuring Income (In)equality: Comparing Survey Questions With Unipolar and Bipolar Scales in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review. doi.org/10.1177/0894439320902461
Kerschbamer, R., & Müller, D. (2020). Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample. Journal of Public Economics, 182, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104076
Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). How long respondents think online surveys should be? New evidence from two online panels in Germany. International Journal of Market Research. DOI: 10.1177/1470785320943049
Wiśniowski, A., Sakshaug, J. W., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Integrating Probability and Nonprobability Samples for Survey Inference. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology.
Yordanova, N., Angelova, M., Lehrer, R., Osnabrügge, M. & Sander, R. (2020). Swaying citizen support for EU membership: Evidence from a survey experiment of German voters. European Union Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520923735

2019

Blesse, S., & Heinemann, F. (2019). Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (19-054).
Blesse, S., Buhlmann, F. & Dörrenberg, P. (2019). Do People Really Want a Simple Tax System? Evidence on Preferences Towards Income Tax Simplification. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.3515915.
Buss, C. (2019). Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: A vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718757684
Duch, R. M., & Falcó-Gimeno, A. (2019). Coalition-Directed Economic Vote and the Finance Minister.
Engst, B.G., Gschwend, T. & Sternberg, S. (2019). Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00204-7
Felderer, B., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Acceptance of the automated online collection of geographical information. Sociological Methods & Research : SMR, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882480
Hahm, H., König, T., Osnabrügge, M., & Frech, E. (2019). Who settles disputes? Treaty design and trade attitudes toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). International Organization, 73(4), 881-900.
Herzing, J. M. E, Blom, A. G.; and Meuleman, B., “Modelling Group-Specific Interviewer Effects on Nonresponse Using Separate Coding for Random Slopes in Multilevel Models” (2019). 2019 Workshop: Interviewers and Their Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective. 24. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociw/24
Herzing, J. M. E., & Blom, A. G. (2019). The Influence of a Person’s Digital Affinity on Unit Nonresponse and Attrition in an Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review 37(3), 404–424. doi.org/10.1177/0894439318774758
Höhne, J. K., Yan, T. (2019). Investigating the impact of violations of the “left and top means first” heuristic on response behavior and data quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2019.1696087
Juhl, S. & Lehrer, R. (2019). Get a Grip on Yourself! Signaling Cohesiveness Through National Party Congresses.
Juhl, S., & Hilpert, D. (2019). Wheeling and dealing behind closed doors: Estimating the causal effect of transparency on policy evaluations using a survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 1-17. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.67
Koos, S., & Naumann, E. (2019). Vom Klimastreik zur Klimapolitik: Die gesellschaftliche Unterstützung der „Fridays for Future “-Bewegung und ihrer Ziele: Forschungsbericht.
Lehrer, R., & Lin, N. (2019). Everything to everyone? Not when you are internally divided. Party Politics. doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812222
McKone Leonard, M. & Ropers, G. Social Desirability in Political Attitudes: A Comparison of Online Probability Panels and Microwork Platforms.
Möhring, K., Teney, C., Buss, C. (2019). Who supports gender quotas for company leadership? An empirical analysis of determinants of support and rejection among German citizens. Soziale Welt, 70(2), 121-143.
Müller, D., & Renes, S. (2019). Fairness views and political preferences: Evidence from a representative sample (No. 2019-08). Working Papers in Economics and Statistics.
Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Ruiz, D., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Supplementing Small Probability Samples with Nonprobability Samples: A Bayesian Approach, Journal of Official Statistics, 35(3), 653-681. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0027
Solodoch, O. (2019). Regaining Control? The Political Impact of Policy Responses to Refugee Crises http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753

2018

Baerg, N., Duell, D., & Lowe, W. (2018). Central bank communication as public opinion: Experimental evidence. Work in Progress.
Doerrenberg, P. & Peichl, A. (2018). Tax Morale and the Role of Social Norms and Reciprocity. Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7149.
Dolls, M., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2018). Attitudes towards euro area reforms: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7141.
Etzel, T. (2018). Essays in Local Public Finance and Political Economy. (Doctoral dissertation).
Gschwend, T., Juhl, S. & Lehrer, R. (2018). Die „Sonntagsfrage“, soziale Erwünschtheit und die AfD: Wie alternative Messmethoden der Politikwissenschaft weiterhelfen können. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 59, 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0106-8
Herzing, J. M. (2018). The impact of technological change on survey nonresponse and measurement (Doctoral dissertation).
Jedinger, A. & Schoen, A. (2018). Anti-Americanism and Public Attitudes toward Transatlantic Trade, German Politics, 27(3), 317-338, DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2017.1332181
Lehrer, R, Juhl, S. & Gschwend, T. (2018). The wisdom of crowds design for sensitive survey questions. Electoral Studies, 57, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.012
Marx, P. & Naumann, E. (2018). Do right-wing parties foster welfare chauvinistic attitudes? A longitudinal study of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. Electoral Studies, 52, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.011
Naumann E. (2018). Tax Constraints, Social Policy Preferences, and Support for Redistribution. Societies. 8(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030046
Naumann, E., & Stoetzer, L. F. (2018). Immigration and support for redistribution: survey experiments in three European countries. West European Politics, 41(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1344040
Silber, H., Stark, T. H., Blom, A. G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Implementing a multinational study of questionnaire design. In Johnson, T. P. Advances in comparative survey methods : multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC) (S. 161-180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch8
Stark, T. H., Silber, H., Krosnick, J. A., Blom, A. G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S. L., Melvin, J., Guðbjörg, A. J., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., & Yu, R. (2018). Generalization of classic question order effects across cultures. Sociological Methods & Research : SMR, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304

2017

Blesse, S., Berger, M., Heinemann, F., et al. (2017). Föderalismuspräferenzen in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 18(2), 145-158. doi:10.1515/pwp-2017-0007
Blom, A. G., & Herzing, J. M. E. (2017). Face-to-face Rekrutierung für ein probabilistisches Onlinepanel. In Faulbaum, F. Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung (S. 99-118). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15834-7_4
Blom, A. G., Herzing, J. M. E., Cornesse, C., Sakshaug, J. W., Krieger, U., & Bossert, D. (2017). Does the Recruitment of Offline Households Increase the Sample Representativeness of Probability-Based Online Panels? Evidence From the German Internet Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316651584
Buß, C. (2017). Public Opinion towards Labour Market Reforms in Europe. A Multidimensional and Dynamic Perspective on Attitudes. (Doctoral dissertation).
Ebbinghaus, B., & Naumann, E. (Eds.). (2017). Welfare state reforms seen from below: comparing public attitudes and organized interests in Britain and Germany. Springer.
Engelmann, D., Janeba, E., Mechtenberg, L. & Wehrhöfer, N. (2017). Preferences over Taxation of High Income Individuals: Evidence from Online and Laboratory Experiments. In ASSA Annual Meeting.
Hahm, H., Osnabrügge, M., Frech, E., & König, T. (2017, January). Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes: A Conjoint Analysis of Public Support for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). In annual conference on The Political Economy of International Organizations, Bern, Switzerland.
McMichael, J. L. (2017). Preferring Refugees (Doctoral dissertation, Duke University Durham).
Muller, D., & Renes, S. (2017). Fairness views and political preferences: Evidence from a large online experiment (No. 2017-10). Working Papers in Economics and Statistics.
Naumann, E. (2017). Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology. Ageing and Society, 37(2), 266-294. doi:10.1017/S0144686X15001129

2016

Angelova, M., König, T. & Proksch, S. (2016). Responsibility attribution in coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Electoral Studies, 43, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.004
Blesse, S., Heinemann, F., & Janeba, E. (2016). Einhaltung der Schuldenbremse und Bewertung von Länderfusionen: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in allen 16 Landesparlamenten (No. 6/2016). ZEW policy brief.
Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S. & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8-25. doi: 10.1177/0894439315574825

2015

Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population: The German Internet Panel. Field Methods, 27(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494
Frech, E., König, T. & Osnabrügge, M. (2015). Öffentliche Unterstützung von Reformen und ihre Stabilität in Zeiten der Eurokrise – eine experimentelle Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit von Gegenargumenten. ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 25(2), 219 – 245. https://doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2015-2-219
Greene, Z. D. & Haber, M. (2015). The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 37, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.002.
Haber, M. (2015). The legislative consequences of internal conflict and inter-party divisions. Research & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015589216
Pforr, K., Blohm, M., Blom, A. G., Erdel, B., Felderer, B., Fräßdorf, M., Hajek, K., Helmschrott, S., Kleinert, C., Koch, A., Krieger, U., Kroh, M., Martin, S., Saßenroth, D., Schmiedeberg, C., Trüdinger, E.-M., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Are incentive effects on response rates and nonresponse bias in large-scale face-to-face surveys generalizable to Germany? Evidence from ten experiments. Public Opinion Quarterly : POQ, 79, 740-768. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv014

2014

Bernecker, A. (2014). Is Status Quo Bias Explained by Anchoring? Evidence from Survey Experiments.
Blom, A. & Durrant, Gabriele B. (2014) Correlates of attrition in the German internet panel: drop-outs and sleepers. AAPOR2014: American Association for Public Opinion Research, United States. 15 - 18 May 2014.
Lenzner, T., & Soiné, H. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP): Modul “Inflation” der November 2014 Welle; Kognitiver Online-Pretest. (GESIS-Projektbericht, 2014/05). Mannheim: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https:// doi.org/10.17173/pretest20
Lenzner, T., Neuert, C., & Otto, W. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) Reforms Monitor 2014: Kognitiver Pretest. (GESIS-Projektbericht, 2014/09). Mannheim: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https:// doi.org/10.17173/pretest20
Wendt, C., Naumann, E. & Klitzke, J. (2014). Reformbedarf im deutschen Gesundheitssystem aus Sicht der Bevölkerung. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 60(4), 333-348.

2013

Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys : a conceptual framework. Survey Methods : Insights from the Field, [1], 1-16. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00001
Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys : a conceptual framework. Survey Methods : Insights from the Field, [1], 1-16. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00001
Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2013). The German Internet panel: Method and results.