Publications

2022

Adendorf, A. (2022). Topic Order in Election Manifestos. How the Order of Policy Issues Affects Voters’ Perceptions of Parties’ Key Issues.
Axenfeld, J. B., Blom, A. G., Bruch, C., & Wolf, C. (2022). Split Questionnaire Designs for Online Surveys: The Impact of Module Construction on Imputation Quality. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smab055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab055
Cornesse, C., Gonzalez Ocanto, M., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Rettig, T., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Measurement instruments for fast and frequent data collection during the early phase of COVID-19 in Germany: reflections on the Mannheim Corona Study. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-022-00030-5
Einarsson, H., Sakshaug, J. W., Cernat, A., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Measurement equivalence in probability and nonprobability online panels. International Journal of Market Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221085206
Epperson, R. (2022). Do Beliefs about Lobbying Affect Pro-environmental Behavior? Experimental Evidence. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4050519
Gsottbauer, E., Müller, D., Müller, S., Trautmann, S. T., & Zudenkova, G. (2022). Social class and (un)ethical behaviour: Causal and correlational evidence. The Economic Journal, ueac022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac022
Höhne, J. K., Krebs, D., & Kühnel, S.-M. (2022). Measuring Income (In)equality: Comparing Survey Questions With Unipolar and Bipolar Scales in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 40(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320902461
Innocenti, F., & Rohde, L. M. (2022). Selective Exposure Reduces Voluntary Contributions: Experimental Evidence from the German Internet Panel. CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series No. 340.
Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., & Reifenscheid, M. (forthcoming). Preferences for Centralized Decision-Making in Times of Crisis: The COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. In M. Debus, M. Tepe, & J. Sauermann (Eds.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie.
Keusch, F., Wenz, A., & Conrad, F. (2022). Do you have your smartphone with you? Behavioral barriers for measuring everyday activities with smartphone sensors. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107054
Kilb, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Mata, J. (2022). A theory-based video intervention to enhance communication and engagement in online health communities: two experiments. Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 10(1), 199-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2032074
Lehrer, R., Stöckle, P., & Juhl, S. (2022). Assessing the relative influence of party unity on vote choice: Evidence from a conjoint experiment.
Lenzner, T., & Höhne, J. K. (2022). Measuring subjective social stratification: How does the graphical layout of rating scales affect response distributions, response effort, and criterion validity in web surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1874607

2021

Alon, T., Coskun, S., Doepke, M., Koll, D., & Tertilt, M. (2021). From Mancession to Shecession: Women's Employment in Regular and Pandemic Recessions. NBER Working Paper No. 28632.
Blesse, S. (2021). Are Your Tax Problems an Opportunity Not to Pay Taxes? Evidence From a Randomized Survey Experiment. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 21-040.
Blesse, S., Buhlmann, F., & Doerrenberg, P. (2021). Attitudes Towards Tax Simplification: Evidence from a Representative Survey and Experiments.
Blom, A. G., & Möhring, K. (2021). Soziale Ungleichheit in der Beschäftigungssituation während der frühen Phase der Coronakrise. Datenreport 2021, 476-483.
Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Cornesse, C., Rettig, T., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., & Krieger, U. (2021). Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of the COVID-19 Contact-Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e23362. https://doi.org/10.2196/23362
Cornesse, C., & Schaurer, I. (2021). Inklusion von Menschen ohne Internet in zufallsbasierte Onlinepanel-Umfragen. In T. Wolbring, H. Leitgöb, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter (pp. 71-98). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34396-5_3
Cornesse, C., & Schaurer, I. (2021). The Long-Term Impact of Different Offline Population Inclusion Strategies in Probability-Based Online Panels: Evidence From the German Internet Panel and the GESIS Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4), 687-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320984131
Cornesse, C., Felderer, B., Fikel, M., Krieger, U., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Recruiting a Probability-Based Online Panel via Postal Mail: Experimental Evidence. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211006059
Cornesse, C., Krieger, U., Sohnius, M.-L., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., & Blom, A. G. (2021). From German Internet Panel to Mannheim Corona Study: Adaptable probability-based online panel infrastructures during the pandemic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12749
Debus, M. (2021). Kosmopolitisches und parochiales Freizeit- und Urlaubsverhalten und ihr Einfluss auf Kandidatensympathie und Wahlabsicht im Kontext der Bundestagswahl 2017. In B. Weßels, & H. Schoen (Eds.), Wahlen und Wähler (pp. 273-295). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33582-3_14
Dolls, M., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2021). Attitudes towards euro area reforms: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 67, 101971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101971
Epperson, R. (2021). Essays in Behavioral and Experimental Economics [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
Felderer, B., Herzing, J. M. E., Bruch, C., Krieger, U., & Blom, A. G. (2021). How does switching a Probability-Based Online Panel to a Smartphone-Optimized Design Affect Response Rates and Smartphone Use? Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2021-00007
Höhne, J. K. (2021). Are respondents ready for audio and voice communication channels in online surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1987121
Juhl, S., & Hilpert, D. (2021). Wheeling and dealing behind closed doors: Estimating the causal effect of transparency on policy evaluations using a survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(1), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.67
Lehrer, R., Bahnsen, O., Müller, K., Neunhöffer, M., Gschwend, T., & Juhl, S. (2021). Crisis Leadership Approval: The Opposing Effects of Perceived Threat and Anxiety.
Mata, J., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Möhring, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., & Naumann, E. (2021). Health behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population-based survey in Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 287, 114333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114333
Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., & Naumann, E. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being: longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family. European Societies, 23(1), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1833066
Möhring, K., Reifenscheid, M., & Weiland, A. (2021). Is the Recession a ‘Shecession’? Gender Inequality in the Employment Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tzma5
Möhring, K., Weiland, A., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Inequality in employment trajectories and their socio-economic consequences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/m95df
Müller, D., & Renes, S. (2021). Fairness views and political preferences: Evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample. Social Choice and Welfare, 56, 679-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01289-5
Rettig, T., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Memory Effects as a Source of Bias in Repeated Survey Measurement. In A. Cernat, & J. W. Sakshaug (Eds.), Measurement Error in Longitudinal Data (pp. 3-18). Oxford University Press.
Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Combining Scientific and Non-scientific Surveys to Improve Estimation and Reduce Costs. In T. Rudas, & G. Péli (Eds.), Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science (pp. 71-93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54936-7_4
Sternberg, S., Brouard, S., & Hönnige, C. (2021). The legitimacy-conferring capacity of constitutional courts: Evidence from a comparative survey experiment. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12480
Wenz, A., & Keusch, F. (2021). The Second-Level Smartphone Divide: A Typology of Smartphone Usage Based on Frequency of Use, Skills, and Types of Activities. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.05142

2020

Ackermann-Piek, D., Korbmacher, J. M., & Krieger, U. (2020). Explaining Interviewer Effects on Survey Unit Nonresponse: A Cross-Survey Analysis. In K. Olson, J. D. Smyth, J. Dykema, A. L. Holbrook, F. Kreuter, & B. T. West (Eds.), Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective (pp. 193-206). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003020219
Baerg, N., Duell, D., & Lowe, W. (2020). Central bank communication as public opinion: Experimental evidence.
Blesse, S., & Heinemann, F. (2020). Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 438-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.018
Blom, A. G. (2020). Zum gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit der Corona-Pandemie. Ergebnisse der Mannheimer Corona-Studie. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 70(35-37), 16-22.
Blom, A. G., Cornesse, C., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., & Reifenscheid, M. (2020). High Frequency and High Quality Survey Data Collection: The Mannheim Corona Study. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7735
Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Das Leben in Deutschland im Ausnahmezustand – Bericht zur Lage vom 20. März bis 09. Juli 2020. German Internet Panel.
Bujard, M., Laß, I., Diabaté, S., Sulak, H., & Schneider, N. F. (2020). Eltern während der Corona-Krise. Zur Improvisation gezwungen. BiB.Bevölkerungs.Studien 1/2020.https://doi.org/10.12765/bro-2020-01
Cornesse, C. (2020). The Utility of Auxiliary Data for Survey Response Modeling: Evidence from the German Internet Panel. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00008
Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914940
Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J. A., De Leeuw, E. D., Legleye, S., Pasek, J., Pennay, D., Phillips, B., Sakshaug, J. W., Struminskaya, B., & Wenz, A. (2020). A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 4-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz041
Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Naumann, E., & Möhring, K. (2020). Determinants of Public Support for COVID-19 Containment Policies in Germany: Evidence from Individual-Level Panel Analyses.
Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Demokratische Kontrolle in der Corona-Krise. German Internet Panel.
Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz politischer Maßnahmen und befürchtete Konsequenzen für die Wirtschaft. German Internet Panel.
Kerschbamer, R., & Müller, D. (2020). Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample. Journal of Public Economics, 182, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104076
Lehrer, R., & Lin, N. (2020). Everything to everyone? Not when you are internally divided. Party Politics, 26(6), 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812222
Lehrer, R., Juhl, S., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Mörhing, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Die vier Phasen des Social Distancing in Deutschland. German Internet Panel.
Möhring, K., & Teney, C. (2020). Largest public opposition to a gender boardroom quota in EU countries with the highest formal gender equality. LSE European Politics and Policy Blog.
Möhring, K., Heinemann, F., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zum subjektiven Arbeitslosigkeitsrisiko der Beschäftigten in Deutschland. German Internet Panel.
Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zur Erwerbstätigkeit in Deutschland 20.3.-14.4.2020. German Internet Panel.
Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zur Erwerbstätigkeit und Kinderbetreuung. German Internet Panel.
Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Inequality in employment during the Corona lockdown: Evidence from Germany. JESP European Social Policy Blog.
Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Weiland, A., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., & Cornesse, C. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zur Nutzung und Akzeptanz von Homeoffice in Deutschland während des Corona-Lockdowns. German Internet Panel.
Naumann, E., Mata, J., Reifenscheid, M., Möhring, K., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zum Angstempfinden in der Bevölkerung. German Internet Panel.
Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). COVID-19 policies in Germany and their social, political, and psychological consequences. European Policy Analysis, 6(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1091
Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). Comparing the participation of Millennials and older age cohorts in the CROss-National Online Survey panel and the German Internet Panel. Survey Research Methods, 14(5), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i5.7619
Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). How long do respondents think online surveys should be? New evidence from two online panels in Germany. International Journal of Market Research, 62(5), 538-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320943049
Wiśniowski, A., Sakshaug, J. W., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Integrating Probability and Nonprobability Samples for Survey Inference. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 120-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz051
Yordanova, N., Angelova, M., Lehrer, R., Osnabrügge, M., & Renes, S. (2020). Swaying citizen support for EU membership: Evidence from a survey experiment of German voters. European Union Politics, 21(39), 429-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520923735
Yordanova, N., Angelova, M., Lehrer, R., Osnabrügge, M., & Renes, S. (2020). Why EU member states should take heed of the sovereignty concerns of their citizens. LSE European Politics and Policy Blog.

2019

Blesse, S., Buhlmann, F., & Dörrenberg, P. (2019). Do People Really Want a Simple Tax System? Evidence on Preferences Towards Income Tax Simplification. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No.19-058.
Buss, C. (2019). Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: A vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718757684
Duch, R. M., & Falcó-Gimeno, A. (2019). Coalition-Directed Economic Vote and the Finance Minister.
Engst, B. G., Gschwend, T., & Sternberg, S. (2019). Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Ein Spiegelbild gesellschaftlicher Präferenzen? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00204-7
Felderer, B., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Acceptance of the automated online collection of geographical information. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882480
Hahm, H., König, T., Osnabrügge, M., & Frech, E. (2019). Who settles disputes? Treaty design and trade attitudes toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). International Organization, 73(4), 881-900. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000249
Herzing, J. M. E., & Blom, A. G. (2019). The Influence of a Person’s Digital Affinity on Unit Nonresponse and Attrition in an Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 37(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318774758
Herzing, J. M. E., Blom, A. G., & Meuleman, B. (2019, February 26-28). Modelling Group-Specific Interviewer Effects on Nonresponse Using Separate Coding for Random Slopes in Multilevel Models [Conference Presentation]. Interviewers and Their Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective Workshop, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska, United States.
Herzing, J. M. E., Vandenplas, C., & Axenfeld, J. B. (2019). A data-driven approach to monitoring data collection in an online panel. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 10(4), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1332/175795919X15694136006114
Höhne, J. K., Yan, T. (2019). Investigating the impact of violations of the “left and top means first” heuristic on response behavior and data quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1696087
Juhl, S., & Lehrer, R. (2019). Get a Grip on Yourself! Signaling Cohesiveness Through National Party Congresses.
Koos, S., & Naumann, E. (2019). Vom Klimastreik zur Klimapolitik: Die gesellschaftliche Unterstützung der „Fridays for Future “-Bewegung und ihrer Ziele.
Möhring, K., Teney, C., & Buss, C. (2019). Who supports gender quotas for company leadership? An empirical analysis of determinants of support and rejection among German citizens. Soziale Welt, 70(2), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2019-2-121
Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Ruiz, D., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Supplementing Small Probability Samples with Nonprobability Samples: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Official Statistics, 35(3), 653-681. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0027
Solodoch, O. (2019). Regaining Control? The Political Impact of Policy Responses to Refugee Crises. International Organization. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753

2018

Cornesse, C. (2018). Representativeness and response quality of survey data [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
Doerrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2018). Tax Morale and the Role of Social Norms and Reciprocity. Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7149.
Dolls, M., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2018). Attitudes towards euro area reforms: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7141.
Etzel, T. (2018). Essays in Local Public Finance and Political Economy [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
Gschwend, T., Juhl, S., & Lehrer, R. (2018). Die „Sonntagsfrage“, soziale Erwünschtheit und die AfD: Wie alternative Messmethoden der Politikwissenschaft weiterhelfen können. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 59, 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0106-8
Herzing, J. M. E. (2018). The impact of technological change on survey nonresponse and measurement [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
Jedinger, A., & Schoen, A. (2018). Anti-Americanism and Public Attitudes toward Transatlantic Trade, German Politics, 27(3), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2017.1332181
Krieger, U. (2018). A penny for your thoughts – the use of cash incentives in face-to-face surveys [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
Lehrer, R., Juhl, S., & Gschwend, T. (2018). The wisdom of crowds design for sensitive survey questions. Electoral Studies, 57, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.012
Leonard, M. M., & Ropers, G. (2018). Social Desirability in Political Attitudes: A Comparison of Online Probability Panels and Microwork Platforms.
Marx, P., & Naumann, E. (2018). Do right-wing parties foster welfare chauvinistic attitudes? A longitudinal study of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. Electoral Studies, 52, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.011
Naumann, E. (2018). Tax Constraints, Social Policy Preferences, and Support for Redistribution. Societies, 8(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030046
Naumann, E., & Stoetzer, L. F. (2018). Immigration and support for redistribution: survey experiments in three European countries. West European Politics, 41(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1344040
Silber, H., Stark, T. H., Blom, A. G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Implementing a multinational study of questionnaire design. In T. P. Johnson (Ed.), Advances in comparative survey methods: multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts(3MC) (pp. 161–180). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch8
Stark, T. H., Silber, H., Krosnick, J. A., Blom, A. G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S. L., Melvin, J., Guðbjörg, A. J., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., & Yu, R. (2018). Generalization of classic question order effects across cultures. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(3), 567-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304

2017

Berger, M., Blesse, S., Heinemann, F., & Eckhard, J. (2017). Föderalismuspräferenzen in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 18(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2017-0007
Blom, A. G., & Herzing, J. M. E. (2017). Face-to-face Rekrutierung für ein probabilistisches Onlinepanel. In F. Faulbaum (Ed.), Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung (pp. 99–118). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15834-7_4
Blom, A. G., Herzing, J. M. E., Cornesse, C., Sakshaug, J. W., Krieger, U., & Bossert, D. (2017). Does the Recruitment of Offline Households Increase the Sample Representativeness of Probability-Based Online Panels? Evidence From the German Internet Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316651584
Buß, C. (2017). Public Opinion towards Labour Market Reforms in Europe. A Multidimensional and Dynamic Perspective on Attitudes [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim].
Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Ackermann-Piek, D., Helmschrott, S., Bruch, C., & Sakshaug, J. W. (2017, March 15-17). The Representativeness of Online Panels: Coverage, Sampling, and Weighting [Conference Presentation]. General Online Research, Berlin, Germany.
Ebbinghaus, B., & Naumann, E. (2017). Welfare state reforms seen from below: comparing public attitudes and organized interests in Britain and Germany. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63652-8
Engelmann, D., Janeba, E., Mechtenberg, L., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2017). Preferences over Taxation of High Income Individuals: Evidence from Online and Laboratory Experiments.
Hahm, H., Osnabrügge, M., Frech, E., & König, T. (2017). Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes: A Conjoint Analysis of Public Support for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
McMichael, J. L. (2017). Preferring Refugees. How German Attitudes Changed During the European Refugee Crisis and Along Historical State Divides [Doctoral dissertation, Duke University].
Naumann, E. (2017). Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology. Ageing and Society, 37(2), 266-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001129

2016

Angelova, M., König, T., & Proksch, S. (2016). Responsibility attribution in coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Electoral Studies, 43, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.004
Blesse, S., Heinemann, F., & Janeba, E. (2016). Einhaltung der Schuldenbremse und Bewertung von Länderfusionen: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in allen 16 Landesparlamenten. ZEW policy brief No. 6/2016.
Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315574825

2015

Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population: The German Internet Panel. Field Methods, 27(4), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494
Frech, E., König, T., & Osnabrügge, M. (2015). Öffentliche Unterstützung von Reformen und ihre Stabilität in Zeiten der Eurokrise – eine experimentelle Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit von Gegenargumenten. ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 25(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2015-2-219
Greene, Z. D., & Haber, M. (2015). The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 37, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.002
Haber, M. (2015). The legislative consequences of internal conflict and inter-party divisions. Research & Politics, 2(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015589216
Pforr, K., Blohm, M., Blom, A. G., Erdel, B., Felderer, B., Fräßdorf, M., Hajek, K., Helmschrott, S., Kleinert, C., Koch, A., Krieger, U., Kroh, M., Martin, S., Saßenroth, D., Schmiedeberg, C., Trüdinger, E.-M., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Are incentive effects on response rates and nonresponse bias in large-scale face-to-face surveys generalizable to Germany? Evidence from ten experiments. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 740-768. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv014

2014

Bernecker, A. (2014). Is Status Quo Bias Explained by Anchoring? Evidence from Survey Experiments.
Blom, A. G., & Durrant, G. B. (2014, May 15-18). Correlates of attrition in the German internet panel: drop-outs and sleepers [Conference Presentation]. AAPOR2014: American Association for Public Opinion Research, Anaheim, United States.
Lenzner, T., & Soiné, H. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) – Modul “Inflation” der November 2014 Welle: Kognitiver Online-Pretest. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.17173/pretest40
Lenzner, T., Neuert, C., & Otto, W. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) Reforms Monitor 2014: Kognitiver Pretest. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.https://doi.org/10.17173/pretest20
Wendt, C., Naumann, E., & Klitzke, J. (2014). Reformbedarf im deutschen Gesundheitssystem aus Sicht der Bevölkerung. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 60(4), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2014-0404

2013

Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys: a conceptual framework. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00001
Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2013). The German Internet panel: Method and results.