Publications

 

2020

  • Ackermann-Piek, D., Korbmacher, J. M., & Krieger, U. (2020). Explaining Interviewer Effects on Survey Unit Nonresponse: A Cross-Survey Analysis. In Olson, K,  Smyth, J. D., Dykema, J., Holbrook, A. L., Kreuter, F., West, B. T., Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective (pp. 193-206). New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, doi.org/10.1201/9781003020219
  • Blom, A. G., Cornesse, C., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., & Reifenscheid, M. (2020). High Frequency and High Quality Survey Data Collection: The Mannheim Corona Study. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7735
  • Cornesse, C. (2020). The Utility of Auxiliary Data for Survey Response Modeling: Evidence from the German Internet Panel. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (SMIF), Special issue: ‘Fieldword Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveys’. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00008
  • Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels. Sociological Methods & Research (online first). doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914940
  • Cornesse, C., Blom, A., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J., De Leeuw, E., & Legleye, S. et al. (2020). A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research. Journal Of Survey Statistics And Methodology, 8(1), 4-36. doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz041
  • Höhne, J. K., Krebs, D., & Kühnel, S.-M. (2020). Measuring Income (In)equality: Comparing Survey Questions With Unipolar and Bipolar Scales in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review. doi.org/10.1177/0894439320902461
  • Kerschbamer, R., & Müller, D. (2020). Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample. Journal of Public Economics, 182, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104076
  • Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). How long do respondents think online surveys should be? New evidence from two online panels in Germany. International Journal of Market Research. DOI: 10.1177/1470785320943049
  • Wiśniowski, A., Sakshaug, J. W., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Integrating Probability and Nonprobability Samples for Survey Inference. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology.
  • Yordanova, N., Angelova, M., Lehrer, R., Osnabrügge, M. & Sander, R. (2020). Swaying citizen support for EU membership: Evidence from a survey experiment of German voters. European Union Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520923735

2019

  • Blesse, S., & Heinemann, F. (2019). Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (19-054).
  • Blesse, S., Buhlmann, F. & Dörrenberg, P. (2019). Do People Really Want a Simple Tax System? Evidence on Preferences Towards Income Tax Simplification. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.3515915.
  • Buss, C. (2019). Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: A vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718757684
  • Duch, R. M., & Falcó-Gimeno, A. (2019). Coalition-Directed Economic Vote and the Finance Minister.
  • Engst, B.G., Gschwend, T. & Sternberg, S. (2019). Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00204-7
  • Felderer, B., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Acceptance of the automated online collection of geographical information. Sociological Methods & Research : SMR, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882480
  • Hahm, H., König, T., Osnabrügge, M., & Frech, E. (2019). Who settles disputes? Treaty design and trade attitudes toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). International Organization, 73(4), 881-900.
  • Herzing, J. M. E, Blom, A. G.; and Meuleman, B., “Modelling Group-Specific Interviewer Effects on Nonresponse Using Separate Coding for Random Slopes in Multilevel Models” (2019). 2019 Workshop: Interviewers and Their Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective. 24. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociw/24
  • Herzing, J. M. E., & Blom, A. G. (2019). The Influence of a Person’s Digital Affinity on Unit Nonresponse and Attrition in an Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review 37(3), 404–424. doi.org/10.1177/0894439318774758
  • Höhne, J. K., Yan, T. (2019). Investigating the impact of violations of the “left and top means first” heuristic on response behavior and data quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2019.1696087
  • Juhl, S. & Lehrer, R. (2019). Get a Grip on Yourself! Signaling Cohesiveness Through National Party Congresses.
  • Juhl, S., & Hilpert, D. (2019). Wheeling and dealing behind closed doors: Estimating the causal effect of transparency on policy evaluations using a survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 1-17. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.67
  • Koos, S., & Naumann, E. (2019). Vom Klimastreik zur Klimapolitik: Die gesellschaftliche Unterstützung der „Fridays for Future “-Bewegung und ihrer Ziele: Forschungsbericht.
  • Lehrer, R., & Lin, N. (2019). Everything to everyone? Not when you are internally divided. Party Politics. doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812222
  • McKone Leonard, M. & Ropers, G. Social Desirability in Political Attitudes: A Comparison of Online Probability Panels and Microwork Platforms.
  • Möhring, K., Teney, C., Buss, C. (2019). Who supports gender quotas for company leadership? An empirical analysis of determinants of support and rejection among German citizens. Soziale Welt, 70(2), 121-143.
  • Müller, D., & Renes, S. (2019). Fairness views and political preferences: Evidence from a representative sample (No. 2019-08). Working Papers in Economics and Statistics.
  • Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Ruiz, D., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Supplementing Small Probability Samples with Nonprobability Samples: A Bayesian Approach, Journal of Official Statistics, 35(3), 653-681. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0027
  • Solodoch, O. (2019). Regaining Control? The Political Impact of Policy Responses to Refugee Crises http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753

2018

  • Baerg, N., Duell, D., & Lowe, W. (2018). Central bank communication as public opinion: Experimental evidence. Work in Progress.
  • Doerrenberg, P. & Peichl, A. (2018). Tax Morale and the Role of Social Norms and Reciprocity. Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7149.
  • Dolls, M., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2018). Attitudes towards euro area reforms: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7141.
  • Etzel, T. (2018). Essays in Local Public Finance and Political Economy. (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Gschwend, T., Juhl, S. & Lehrer, R. (2018). Die „Sonntagsfrage“, soziale Erwünschtheit und die AfD: Wie alternative Messmethoden der Politikwissenschaft weiterhelfen können. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 59, 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0106-8
  • Herzing, J. M. (2018). The impact of technological change on survey nonresponse and measurement (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Jedinger, A.  & Schoen, A. (2018). Anti-Americanism and Public Attitudes toward Transatlantic Trade, German Politics, 27(3), 317-338, DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2017.1332181
  • Lehrer, R, Juhl, S. & Gschwend, T. (2018). The wisdom of crowds design for sensitive survey questions. Electoral Studies, 57, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.012
  • Marx, P. & Naumann, E. (2018). Do right-wing parties foster welfare chauvinistic attitudes? A longitudinal study of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. Electoral Studies, 52, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.011
  • Naumann E. (2018). Tax Constraints, Social Policy Preferences, and Support for Redistribution. Societies. 8(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030046
  • Naumann, E., & Stoetzer, L. F. (2018). Immigration and support for redistribution: survey experiments in three European countries. West European Politics, 41(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1344040
  • Silber, H., Stark, T. H., Blom, A. G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Implementing a multinational study of questionnaire design. In Johnson, T. P. Advances in comparative survey methods : multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC) (S. 161-180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch8
  • Stark, T. H., Silber, H., Krosnick, J. A., Blom, A. G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S. L., Melvin, J., Guðbjörg, A. J., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., & Yu, R. (2018). Generalization of classic question order effects across cultures. Sociological Methods & Research : SMR, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304

2017

  • Blesse, S., Berger, M., Heinemann, F., et al. (2017). Föderalismuspräferenzen in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 18(2), 145-158. doi:10.1515/pwp-2017-0007
  • Blom, A. G., & Herzing, J. M. E. (2017). Face-to-face Rekrutierung für ein probabilistisches Onlinepanel. In Faulbaum, F. Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung (S. 99-118). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15834-7_4
  • Blom, A. G., Herzing, J. M. E., Cornesse, C., Sakshaug, J. W., Krieger, U., & Bossert, D. (2017). Does the Recruitment of Offline Households Increase the Sample Representativeness of Probability-Based Online Panels? Evidence From the German Internet Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316651584
  • Buß, C. (2017). Public Opinion towards Labour Market Reforms in Europe. A Multidimensional and Dynamic Perspective on Attitudes. (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Ebbinghaus, B., & Naumann, E. (Eds.). (2017). Welfare state reforms seen from below: comparing public attitudes and organized interests in Britain and Germany. Springer.
  • Engelmann, D., Janeba, E., Mechtenberg, L. & Wehrhöfer, N. (2017). Preferences over Taxation of High Income Individuals: Evidence from Online and Laboratory Experiments. In ASSA Annual Meeting.
  • Hahm, H., Osnabrügge, M., Frech, E., & König, T. (2017, January). Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes: A Conjoint Analysis of Public Support for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). In annual conference on The Political Economy of International Organizations, Bern, Switzerland.
  • McMichael, J. L. (2017). Preferring Refugees (Doctoral dissertation, Duke University Durham).
  • Muller, D., & Renes, S. (2017). Fairness views and political preferences: Evidence from a large online experiment (No. 2017-10). Working Papers in Economics and Statistics.
  • Naumann, E. (2017). Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology. Ageing and Society, 37(2), 266-294. doi:10.1017/S0144686X15001129

2016

  • Angelova, M., König, T. & Proksch, S. (2016). Responsibility attribution in coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Electoral Studies, 43, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.004
  • Blesse, S., Heinemann, F., & Janeba, E. (2016). Einhaltung der Schuldenbremse und Bewertung von Länderfusionen: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in allen 16 Landesparlamenten (No. 6/2016). ZEW policy brief.
  • Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S. & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8-25. doi: 10.1177/0894439315574825

 

 

2015

  • Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population: The German Internet Panel. Field Methods, 27(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494
  • Frech, E., König, T. & Osnabrügge, M. (2015). Öffentliche Unterstützung von Reformen und ihre Stabilität in Zeiten der Eurokrise – eine experimentelle Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit von Gegenargumenten. ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 25(2), 219 – 245. https://doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2015-2-219
  • Greene, Z. D. & Haber, M. (2015). The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 37, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.002.
  • Haber, M. (2015). The legislative consequences of internal conflict and inter-party divisions. Research & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015589216
  • Pforr, K., Blohm, M., Blom, A. G., Erdel, B., Felderer, B., Fräßdorf, M., Hajek, K., Helmschrott, S., Kleinert, C., Koch, A., Krieger, U., Kroh, M., Martin, S., Saßenroth, D., Schmiedeberg, C., Trüdinger, E.-M., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Are incentive effects on response rates and nonresponse bias in large-scale face-to-face surveys generalizable to Germany? Evidence from ten experiments. Public Opinion Quarterly : POQ, 79, 740-768. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv014

2014

  • Bernecker, A. (2014). Is Status Quo Bias Explained by Anchoring? Evidence from Survey Experiments.
  • Blom, A. & Durrant, Gabriele B. (2014) Correlates of attrition in the German internet panel: drop-outs and sleepers. AAPOR2014: American Association for Public Opinion Research, United States. 15 - 18 May 2014.
  • Lenzner, T., & Soiné, H. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP): Modul “Inflation” der November 2014 Welle; Kognitiver Online-Pretest. (GESIS-Projektbericht, 2014/05). Mannheim: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https:// doi.org/10.17173/pretest20
  • Lenzner, T., Neuert, C., & Otto, W. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) Reforms Monitor 2014: Kognitiver Pretest. (GESIS-Projektbericht, 2014/09). Mannheim: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https:// doi.org/10.17173/pretest20
  • Wendt, C., Naumann, E. & Klitzke, J. (2014). Reformbedarf im deutschen Gesundheitssystem aus Sicht der Bevölkerung. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 60(4), 333-348.

2013

  • Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys : a conceptual framework. Survey Methods : Insights from the Field, [1], 1-16. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00001
  • Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys : a conceptual framework. Survey Methods : Insights from the Field, [1], 1-16. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00001
  • Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2013). The German Internet panel: Method and results.