Bach, R. L., Cornesse, C., & Daikeler, J. (2024). Equipping the Offline Population with Internet Access in an Online Panel: Does It Make a Difference? Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 12(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smad003
Bach, R. L., Silber, H., Gerdon, F., Keusch, F., Schonlau, M., & Schröder, J. (2024). To share or not to share – understanding individuals’ willingness to share biomarkers, sensor data, and medical records. Information, Communication & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2351439
Herzing, J. M. E., Blom, A. G., & Meuleman, B. (2024). Modeling Group-Specific Interviewer Effects on Survey Participation Using Separate Coding for Random Slopes in Multilevel Models. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 12(1), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smac025
Höhne, J. K., Ziller, C., & Lenzner, T. (2024). Investigating respondents’ willingness to participate in video-based web surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 66(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231198788
Fehr, D., Müller, D., & Preuss, M. (2024). Social mobility perceptions and inequality acceptance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 221, 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.03.008
Rettig, T. & Blom, A. G. (2024). Investigating Respondent Attention to Experimental Text Lengths. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smad044. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smad044
Silber, H., Breuer, J., Felderer, B., Gerdon, F., Stammann, P., Daikeler, J., Keusch, F., & Weiß, B. (2024). Asking for Traces: A Vignette Study on Acceptability Norms and Personal Willingness to Donate Digital Trace Data. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2aum8
Szafran, D. & Bach, R. (2024). The Human Must Remain the Central Focus: Subjective Fairness Perceptions in Automated Decision-Making. Minds & Machines, 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09684-y
2023
Akhtar, A.; Ye, H. (2023). Reproducibility and Robustness Replicability of Gsottbauer et al. (2022), I4R Discussion Paper Series, No. 29, Institute for Replication (I4R). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/270890
Bach, R. L., Cornesse, C., & Daikeler, J. (2023). Equipping the Offline Population with Internet Access in an Online Panel: Does It Make a Difference? Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smad003. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smad003
Behrens, L., Nyhuis, D., & Gschwend, T. (2023). Constructive and Destructive Legislative Review: The Government-Opposition Divide in Parliamentary Oversight. The Journal of Politics, 85(1), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1086/720649
Bjånesøy, L., Ivarsflaten, E., & Berntzen, L. E. (2023). Public political tolerance of the far right in contemporary Western Europe. West European Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2167046
Blesse, S. (2023). Do your tax problems make tax evasion seem more justifiable? Evidence from a survey experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 102365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102365
Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2023). Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels. Sociological Methods & Research, 52(2), 879–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914940
Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Sohnius, M., Gonzalez Ocanto, M., Rettig, T., & Ungefucht, M. (2023). Experimental Evidence on Panel Conditioning Effects when Increasing the Surveying Frequency in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Survey Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2023.v17i3.7990
Engelmann, D., Janeba, E., Mechtenberg, L., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2023). Preferences over taxation of high-income individuals: Evidence from a survey experiment. European Economic Review, 157, 104505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104505
Friedel, S., Felderer, B., Krieger, U., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2023). The Early Bird Catches the Worm! Setting a Deadline for Online Panel Recrutiment Incentives. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 370–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221096970
Gummer, T., Höhne, J. K., Rettig, T., Roßmann, J., & Kummerow, M. (2023). Is there a growing use of mobile devices in web surveys? Evidence from 128 web surveys in Germany. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01601-8
Gummer, T., Kunz, T., Rettig, T., & Höhne, J. K. (2023). How To Detect and Influence Looking Up Answers to Political Knowledge Questions in Web Surveys? Public Opinion Quarterly, nfad027. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad027
Höhne, J. K. (2023). Are respondents ready for audio and voice communication channels in online surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(3), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1987121
Höhne, J. K., Krebs, D., & Kühnel, S. M. (2023). Investigating Direction Effects in Rating Scales With Five and Seven Points in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Survey Research Methods, 193–204 Pages. https://doi.org/10.18148/SRM/2023.V17I2.8006
Rammstedt, B., Roemer, L., & Lechner, C. (2023). Consistency of the structural properties of the BFI-10 across 16 samples from eight large-scale surveys in Germany. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000765
Rammstedt, B., Roemer, L., Mutschler, J., & Lechner, C. (2023). The Big Five Personality Dimensions in Large-Scale Surveys: An Overview of 25 German Data Sets for Personality Research. Personality Science, 4, 1–25. doi.org/10.5964/ps.10769
Rettig, T. & Struminskaya, B. (2023). Memory Effects in Online Panel Surveys: Investigating Respondents’ Ability to Recall Responses from a Previous Panel Wave. Survey Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2023.v17i3.7991
Rohr, B., Silber, H., & Felderer, B. (2023). Comparing the Accuracy of Univariate, Bivariate, and Multivariate Estimates across Probability and Non-Probability Surveys with Populations Benchmarks [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n6ehf
Axenfeld, J. B., Blom, A. G., Bruch, C., & Wolf, C. (2022). Split Questionnaire Designs for Online Surveys: The Impact of Module Construction on Imputation Quality. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smab055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab055
Axenfeld, J. B., Bruch, C., & Wolf, C. (2022). General-purpose imputation of planned missing data in social surveys: Different strategies and their effect on correlations. Statistics Surveys, 16, 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1214/22-SS137
Behrens, L., Nyhuis, D., & Gschwend, T. (2022). Constructive and Destructive Legislative Review: The Government-Opposition Divide in Parliamentary Oversight. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/720649
Cornesse, C., Felderer, B., Fikel, M., Krieger, U., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Recruiting a Probability-Based Online Panel via Postal Mail: Experimental Evidence. Social Science Computer Review, 40(5), 1259–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211006059
Cornesse, C., Gonzalez Ocanto, M., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Rettig, T., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Measurement instruments for fast and frequent data collection during the early phase of COVID-19 in Germany: reflections on the Mannheim Corona Study. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-022-00030-5
Cornesse, C., Krieger, U., Sohnius, M.-L., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., & Blom, A. G. (2022). From German Internet Panel to Mannheim Corona Study: Adaptable probability-based online panel infrastructures during the pandemic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 185(3), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12749
Duch, R. M., & Falcó-Gimeno, A. (2022). Collective Decision-Making and the Economic Vote. Comparative Political Studies, 55(5), 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211036045
Ebbinghaus, B., Lehner, L., & Naumann, E. (2022). Welfare state support during the COVID-19 pandemic: Change and continuity in public attitudes towards social policies in Germany. European Policy Analysis, 8, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1152
Einarsson, H., Sakshaug, J. W., Cernat, A., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Measurement equivalence in probability and nonprobability online panels. International Journal of Market Research, 64(4), 484–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221085206
Epperson, R. (2022). Do Beliefs about Lobbying Affect Pro-environmental Behavior? Experimental Evidence. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4050519
Fehr, D., Müller, D., & Preuss, M. (2022). (In-)equality of Opportunity, Fairness, and Distributional Preferences. CESifo Working Paper No. 10001. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4257200
Felderer, B., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Acceptance of the Automated Online Collection of Geographical Information. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(2),866–886 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882480
Felderer, B., & Herzing, J. M. E. (2022). What about the Less IT Literate? A Comparison of Different Postal Recruitment Strategies to an Online Panel of the General Population. Field Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X22113294
Friedel, S., Felderer, B., Krieger, U., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2022). The Early Bird Catches the Worm! Setting a Deadline for Online Panel Recruitment Incentives. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221096970
Gsottbauer, E., Müller, D., Müller, S., Trautmann, S. T., & Zudenkova, G. (2022). Social class and (un)ethical behaviour: Causal and correlational evidence. The Economic Journal, ueac022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac022
Höhne, J. K., Krebs, D., & Kühnel, S.-M. (2022). Measuring Income (In)equality: Comparing Survey Questions With Unipolar and Bipolar Scales in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 40(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320902461
Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Naumann, E., Möhring, K., & Reifenscheid, M. (2022). Preferences for Centralized Decision-Making in Times of Crisis: the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. In J. Sauermann, M. Tepe, & M. Debus (Eds.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie (pp. 1–27). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35878-5_1
Kern, C., Gerdon, F., Bach, R. L., Keusch, F., & Kreuter, F. (2022). Humans versus machines: Who is perceived to decide fairer? Experimental evidence on attitudes toward automated decision-making. Patterns, 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100591
Keusch, F., Wenz, A., & Conrad, F. (2022). Do you have your smartphone with you? Behavioral barriers for measuring everyday activities with smartphone sensors. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107054
Kilb, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Mata, J. (2022). A theory-based video intervention to enhance communication and engagement in online health communities: two experiments. Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 10(1), 199–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2032074
Lehrer, R., Stöckle, P., & Juhl, S. (2022). Assessing the relative influence of party unity on vote choice: Evidence from a conjoint experiment. Political Science Research and Methods. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2022.45
Lenzner, T., & Höhne, J. K. (2022). Measuring subjective social stratification: How does the graphical layout of rating scales affect response distributions, response effort, and criterion validity in web surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1874607
Rettig, T., Blom, A. G., & Höhne, J. K. (2022). Memory Effects: A Comparison Across Question Types. Survey Research Methods, 17(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2023.v17i1.7903
Revilla, M., Höhne, J. K., & Rettig, T. (2022). Differences in measurement quality depending on recall: results for a question about trust in the parliament. Quality & Quantity.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01441-6
Blom, A. G., Wenz, A., Cornesse, C., Rettig, T., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., & Krieger, U. (2021). Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of the COVID-19 Contact-Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e23362. https://doi.org/10.2196/23362
Cornesse, C., & Schaurer, I. (2021). Inklusion von Menschen ohne Internet in zufallsbasierte Onlinepanel-Umfragen. In T. Wolbring, H. Leitgöb, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter (pp. 71–98). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34396-5_3
Cornesse, C., & Schaurer, I. (2021). The Long-Term Impact of Different Offline Population Inclusion Strategies in Probability-Based Online Panels: Evidence From the German Internet Panel and the GESIS Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320984131
Debus, M. (2021). Kosmopolitisches und parochiales Freizeit- und Urlaubsverhalten und ihr Einfluss auf Kandidatensympathie und Wahlabsicht im Kontext der Bundestagswahl 2017. In B. Weßels, & H. Schoen (Eds.), Wahlen und Wähler (pp. 273–295). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33582-3_14
Dolls, M., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2021). Attitudes towards euro area reforms: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 67, 101971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101971
Felderer, B., Herzing, J. M. E., Bruch, C., Krieger, U., & Blom, A. G. (2021). How does switching a Probability-Based Online Panel to a Smartphone-Optimized Design Affect Response Rates and Smartphone Use? Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2021-00007
Silber, H., Tvinnereim, E., Stark, T. H., Blom, A. G., Krosnick, J. A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S. L., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A.-S., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., & Tu, S.-H. (2021). Lack of Replication or Generalization? Cultural Values Explain a Question Wording Effect. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smab007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab007
Höhne, J. K. (2021). Are respondents ready for audio and voice communication channels in online surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1987121
Juhl, S., & Hilpert, D. (2021). Wheeling and dealing behind closed doors: Estimating the causal effect of transparency on policy evaluations using a survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.67
Mata, J., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Reifenscheid, M., Möhring, K., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., & Naumann, E. (2021). Health behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population-based survey in Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 287, 114333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114333
Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., & Naumann, E. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being: longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family. European Societies, 23(1), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1833066
Möhring, K., Reifenscheid, M., & Weiland, A. (2021). Is the Recession a ‘Shecession’? Gender Inequality in the Employment Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tzma5
Möhring, K., Weiland, A., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Inequality in employment trajectories and their socio-economic consequences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/m95df
Müller, D., & Renes, S. (2021). Fairness views and political preferences: Evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample. Social Choice and Welfare, 56, 679–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01289-5
Rettig, T., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Memory Effects as a Source of Bias in Repeated Survey Measurement. In A. Cernat, & J. W. Sakshaug (Eds.), Measurement Error in Longitudinal Data (pp. 3–18). Oxford University Press.
Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2021). Repeatedly Measuring Political Interest: Can we Reduce Respondent’ Recall Ability and Memory Effects in Surveys Using Memory Interference Tasks? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(3), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa035
Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2021). Combining Scientific and Non-scientific Surveys to Improve Estimation and Reduce Costs. In T. Rudas, & G. Péli (Eds.), Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science (pp. 71–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54936-7_4
Sternberg, S., Brouard, S., & Hönnige, C. (2021). The legitimacy-conferring capacity of constitutional courts: Evidence from a comparative survey experiment. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12480
Wenz, A. (2021). Completing Web Surveys on Mobile Devices. Does Screen Size Affect Data Quality? In T. Wolbring, H. Leitgöb, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter (pp. 101–121). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34396-5_4
Wenz, A., & Keusch, F. (2021). The Second-Level Smartphone Divide: A Typology of Smartphone Usage Based on Frequency of Use, Skills, and Types of Activities. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.05142
2020
Ackermann-Piek, D., Korbmacher, J. M., & Krieger, U. (2020). Explaining Interviewer Effects on Survey Unit Nonresponse: A Cross-Survey Analysis. In K. Olson, J. D. Smyth, J. Dykema, A. L. Holbrook, F. Kreuter, & B. T. West (Eds.), Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective (pp. 193–206). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003020219
Blesse, S., & Heinemann, F. (2020). Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 438–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.018
Blom, A. G., Cornesse, C., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., & Reifenscheid, M. (2020). High Frequency and High Quality Survey Data Collection: The Mannheim Corona Study. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7735
Bujard, M., Laß, I., Diabaté, S., Sulak, H., & Schneider, N. F. (2020). Eltern während der Corona-Krise. Zur Improvisation gezwungen. BiB.Bevölkerungs.Studien 1/2020.https://doi.org/10.12765/bro-2020-01
Cornesse, C. (2020). The Utility of Auxiliary Data for Survey Response Modeling: Evidence from the German Internet Panel. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00008
Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914940
Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J. A., De Leeuw, E. D., Legleye, S., Pasek, J., Pennay, D., Phillips, B., Sakshaug, J. W., Struminskaya, B., & Wenz, A. (2020). A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz041
Engelmann, D., Janeba, E., Mechtenberg, L., & Wehrhöfer, N. (2020). Preferences Over Taxation of High-Income Individuals: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. CESifo Working Paper No. 8595. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707935
Engst, B. G., Gschwend, T., & Sternberg, S. (2020). Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Ein Spiegelbild gesellschaftlicher Präferenzen? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00204-7
Kerschbamer, R., & Müller, D. (2020). Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample. Journal of Public Economics, 182, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104076
Lehrer, R., & Lin, N. (2020). Everything to everyone? Not when you are internally divided. Party Politics, 26(6), 783–794.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812222
Naumann, E., Möhring, K., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Lehrer, R., Krieger, U., Juhl, S., Friedel, S., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). COVID-19 policies in Germany and their social, political, and psychological consequences. European Policy Analysis, 6(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1091
Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). Comparing the participation of Millennials and older age cohorts in the CROss-National Online Survey panel and the German Internet Panel. Survey Research Methods, 14(5), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i5.7619
Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). How long do respondents think online surveys should be? New evidence from two online panels in Germany. International Journal of Market Research, 62(5), 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320943049
Wiśniowski, A., Sakshaug, J. W., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2020). Integrating Probability and Nonprobability Samples for Survey Inference. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 120–147.https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz051
Yordanova, N., Angelova, M., Lehrer, R., Osnabrügge, M., & Renes, S. (2020). Swaying citizen support for EU membership: Evidence from a survey experiment of German voters. European Union Politics, 21(39), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520923735
Buss, C. (2019). Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: A vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718757684
Hahm, H., König, T., Osnabrügge, M., & Frech, E. (2019). Who settles disputes? Treaty design and trade attitudes toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). International Organization, 73(4), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000249
Herzing, J. M. E., & Blom, A. G. (2019). The Influence of a Person’s Digital Affinity on Unit Nonresponse and Attrition in an Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 37(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318774758
Herzing, J. M. E., Vandenplas, C., & Axenfeld, J. B. (2019). A data-driven approach to monitoring data collection in an online panel. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 10(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1332/175795919X15694136006114
Höhne, J. K., Yan, T. (2019). Investigating the impact of violations of the “left and top means first” heuristic on response behavior and data quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1696087
Möhring, K., Teney, C., & Buss, C. (2019). Who supports gender quotas for company leadership? An empirical analysis of determinants of support and rejection among German citizens. Soziale Welt, 70(2), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2019-2-121
Sakshaug, J. W., Wiśniowski, A., Ruiz, D., & Blom, A. G. (2019). Supplementing Small Probability Samples with Nonprobability Samples: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Official Statistics, 35(3), 653–681. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0027
Solodoch, O. (2019). Regaining Control? The Political Impact of Policy Responses to Refugee Crises. International Organization. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753
Doerrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2018). Tax Morale and the Role of Social Norms and Reciprocity. Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7149. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3237993
Gschwend, T., Juhl, S., & Lehrer, R. (2018). Die „Sonntagsfrage“, soziale Erwünschtheit und die AfD: Wie alternative Messmethoden der Politikwissenschaft weiterhelfen können. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 59, 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0106-8
Marx, P., & Naumann, E. (2018). Do right-wing parties foster welfare chauvinistic attitudes? A longitudinal study of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. Electoral Studies, 52, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.011
Naumann, E. (2018). Tax Constraints, Social Policy Preferences, and Support for Redistribution. Societies, 8(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030046
Naumann, E., & Stoetzer, L. F. (2018). Immigration and support for redistribution: survey experiments in three European countries. West European Politics, 41(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1344040
Silber, H., Stark, T. H., Blom, A. G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Implementing a multinational study of questionnaire design. In T. P. Johnson (Ed.), Advances in comparative survey methods: multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts(3MC) (pp. 161–180). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch8
Stark, T. H., Silber, H., Krosnick, J. A., Blom, A. G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S. L., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., & Yu, R.-r. (2018). Generalization of classic question order effects across cultures. Sociological Methods & Research,49(3), 567-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304
2017
Berger, M., Blesse, S., Heinemann, F., & Eckhard, J. (2017). Föderalismuspräferenzen in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 18(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2017-0007
Blom, A. G., & Herzing, J. M. E. (2017). Face-to-face Rekrutierung für ein probabilistisches Onlinepanel. In S. Eifler, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung (pp. 99–118). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15834-7_4
Blom, A. G., Herzing, J. M. E., Cornesse, C., Sakshaug, J. W., Krieger, U., & Bossert, D. (2017). Does the Recruitment of Offline Households Increase the Sample Representativeness of Probability-Based Online Panels? Evidence From the German Internet Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316651584
Ebbinghaus, B., & Naumann, E. (2017). Welfare state reforms seen from below: comparing public attitudes and organized interests in Britain and Germany. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63652-8
Naumann, E. (2017). Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology. Ageing and Society, 37(2), 266-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001129
2016
Angelova, M., König, T., & Proksch, S. (2016). Responsibility attribution in coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Electoral Studies, 43, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.004
Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315574825
2015
Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population: The German Internet Panel. Field Methods, 27(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494
Frech, E., König, T., & Osnabrügge, M. (2015). Öffentliche Unterstützung von Reformen und ihre Stabilität in Zeiten der Eurokrise – eine experimentelle Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit von Gegenargumenten. ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 25(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2015-2-219
Greene, Z. D., & Haber, M. (2015). The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 37, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.002
Haber, M. (2015). The legislative consequences of internal conflict and inter-party divisions. Research & Politics, 2(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015589216
Pforr, K., Blohm, M., Blom, A. G., Erdel, B., Felderer, B., Fräßdorf, M., Hajek, K., Helmschrott, S., Kleinert, C., Koch, A., Krieger, U., Kroh, M., Martin, S., Saßenroth, D., Schmiedeberg, C., Trüdinger, E.-M., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Are incentive effects on response rates and nonresponse bias in large-scale face-to-face surveys generalizable to Germany? Evidence from ten experiments. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 740-768. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv014
Lenzner, T., & Soiné, H. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) – Modul “Inflation” der November 2014 Welle: Kognitiver Online-Pretest. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.17173/pretest40
Lenzner, T., Neuert, C., & Otto, W. (2014). German Internet Panel (GIP) Reforms Monitor 2014: Kognitiver Pretest. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.https://doi.org/10.17173/pretest20
Wendt, C., Naumann, E., & Klitzke, J. (2014). Reformbedarf im deutschen Gesundheitssystem aus Sicht der Bevölkerung. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 60(4), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2014-0404
2013
Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys: a conceptual framework. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00001
In order to improve performance and enhance the user experience for the visitors to our website, we use cookies and store anonymous usage data. For more information please read our privacy policy.